Project & Team organization, managment, and prioritizing
--How should the team be organized?
Type set to task: We need to figure this out.
Impact set to high: Team organization shapes this project, and we need to figure this out once we are all organized.
-I believe than the projects they must take a degree
For my right now part in agreement with XPero that I will go for modifying XPize code in order that he be compatible with NSIS 2.38
And the improvements that I propose for the moment and I can do for this code 4.6 is:
- Multilanguaje Support
- InstallerSystemFiles*.nsi and UninstallerSystemFiles*.nsi in one file (In a Macro)
- XPize 4.*.* - Source Full and Lite in an alone code.
- NSIS MUI2
- various improvements
from ChrisKuhli-- - Should it be a team of several people working with the sources we now have?
from W3bbo-- I don't think the project needs a "team" of developers; just one or two would do just fine (too many chefs spoil the soup, so to speak) as it is just a utility program. Personally, I'd like to see the project written in C/C++ since it reduces dependencies on .NET, but I'm easy either way and I think the pragmatic choice is continuing with the current code base (so long as it is a spaghetti pile of anonymous methods, delegates, and fails FxCop spectacularly) ...
from doomangel-- I've working in a project based on vize code for a month now and what i have done is some minor changes or additions to the codebase. i don't think the code needs improvement, if we could create a team our main goal should be to discover all the non vista or non xp icons and replace the resources.
from Zoom7000-- Also, I personally think it would be a good idea to try to get either peyronnx or zedox on the project because they have already worked on their own versions and their experience would be of great benefit.